Road Trip with No Map
The concept of Backward Design has been repeatedly discussed
throughout the many education courses I have taken. It seems to me, that this process of
understanding where you are going is the only ethical and reasonable method of
proceeding through any task. In the
world of education, clear goals and understanding the reasoning for an end
result not only guide a student’s progression, but they also keep individual
tasks or activities in perspective which assists and enriches the learning
process.
For example, one would most likely not embark on a road trip
without a clear understanding of a destination in mind. Without knowing where to go, the journey
would be a blind attempt to reach the unknown.
With a set destination, one can check a road map to assure they are on
the correct path towards where they want to be.
This same concept can be applied to instruction planning.
A backward design approach to teaching allows for
instructors to use mandated standards to create a framework for
instruction. By using standards,
teachers can then establish the desired goals and provide students with
essential questions that will help guide their understanding of key concepts, specific
knowledge, and the skills they will learn throughout a lesson or unit. Therefore, standards provide a sort of
destination and the teacher needs to decide which path to take.
This path that the teacher chooses is where differentiated and
meaningful instruction guide learners toward the desired goals. Through established acceptable evidence of
progress, teachers can plan proper instruction that clearly indicates student
comprehension and also assess the need for redirection.
You have such a great way of looking at the logistics unit planning. In my post, I talked a great deal about how logistically the idea made sense, but in reality I have major issues figuring out how to enact great lessons all the time. Do you run into any problems when planning lessons? If so, what?
ReplyDelete